I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, but I am.

Quick summary (and please, someone correct me if I get this wrong): Helix, an SF magazine of which I had not previously heard, is edited by a William Sanders. Sanders sent a rejection note to a Luke Jackson, who posted the full contents on the Web. Jackson later removed the letter and apologized for having posted it, in a very strange way, and said Sanders's words were being taken out of context.

Sanders's words included:
"“most of the SF magazines are very leery of publishing anything that might offend the sheet heads” and
“You did a good job of exploring the worm-brained mentality of those people - at the end we still don’t really understand it, but then no one from the civilized world ever can - and I was pleased to see that you didn’t engage in the typical error of trying to make this evil bastard sympathetic, or give him human qualities.” (excerpts from Tobias Bucknell's page because the original post has been removed).

I am so floored that anyone would write those things, let alone in a rejection letter, that I hardly know where to start (but I'll try). One just doesn't talk about people that way! "sheet heads"? "the worm-brained mentality of those people"? Jackson insists Sanders meant only his protagonist, but the "sheet heads" are potential readers, not characters, and his protagonist is singular, so I don't think context really helps.

Much of the conversation seems to revolve around whether Jackson had any legal or ethical right to post the letter in full. To me, that seems a bit beside the point; at the very least, he had the right to post excerpts such as Bucknell includes, and some of the people addressing these "rights" seem unconcerned about the attitudes the rejection letter reveals, which I find far more frightening than the prospect of rejection letters being posted.

[livejournal.com profile] rydra_wong has a great set of links to the matter (and a somewhat related controversy over anthologies that emphasize male writers over female), in her posts for July 9 and 10.

Warning: most of her links connect to people condemning racism, but some of them quote or link to people who attack those who object to racism. Some of the language may not be work-safe, and parts are just really depressing; as I commented on one of Rydra's entries,
Neil Clarke's comment, "Dear lord, people like that do exist. I think I must live a sheltered life or perhaps I just hang out with a better quality of people" largely sums up my reaction to this whole mess....
Tags:

From: [identity profile] or-mabinogi.livejournal.com


I saw a related post on this at Scienceblogs and really did not know what it was all about. At first glance I thought "sheet head" was a cute way of writing "shithead". Then I hear it's a racial slur and I had to think about whom it was slurring. I had never heard it before. I've heard Towel Head. And Dot Head. And I absolutely hate it when I hear my boss use those terms.

Uncool.

From: [identity profile] delphia2000.livejournal.com


I guess I'm not one to talk since I do recognize I have some racist attitudes, but I don't flaunt them nor am I proud of them. And I don't use racial slurs. I can agree that in most cases, you don't share personal correspondence without the permission of the other person, but I can clearly see this case was exceptional and deserved to be aired.
ext_2180: laurel leaf (laurel leaf)

From: [identity profile] loriel-eris.livejournal.com


I was very much "Huh?" at your whole post until I followed through on various links. I got as far as thinking "Oh, this Sanders seems to be writing a very informal rejection letter, which doesn't seem to be overly professional of him, but I'm kinda lost as to what's causing the complete shit-storm."

And then I saw [livejournal.com profile] or_mabinogi's comment and thought "Oh, so there was racial name calling?" It wasn't until I followed various links that I had any clue as do what Sheet Head was. (And then, but context/implication, what Dot Head and Towel Head.) Seriously, even when I realised that it was racial, I was still looking at completely blankly. I@ve never heard any of these terms before. Possibly not what I was aiming for in my education today tho...

From: [identity profile] a-phoenixdragon.livejournal.com


OMG... Can this be real? And amongst those who are suppose to be of a more 'learned' and 'enlightened' group? Maybe I'm naive, or just stupid - I guess you can throw me in with the 'worm-brains' - but this is simply astounding in a world that is striving to move forward - and out of the learned sections, this is totally intolerable! No wonder our morals, ethics and modern standards are at a stand-still!

*Hugs you*

From: [identity profile] a-phoenixdragon.livejournal.com


At least people dumb enough to say it.

It seems that we will always have some form of ignorance and bigotry - we are talking humans after all! But to WRITE such a thing - much less believe in what you wrote?

*Shakes head*

*Is bewildered*

From: [identity profile] flingslass.livejournal.com


Seriously, I thought it was about the KKK. They're sheetheads aren't they?
Toatally bigotted, totally unprofessional and totally off! I too am a little bit sheltered. I know people who still insist on the right to say something offensive. Their excuse. "They do it to us"
I really try to treat others the way I want to be treated. Naive, I know but...

From: (Anonymous)

I should say


Tahnks for posting

From: (Anonymous)

thanks much


Great page.., dude

From: (Anonymous)

well done


thank you, man

From: (Anonymous)

thank you


Good page., man
.

Profile

aelfgyfu_mead: Aelfgyfu as a South Park-style cartoon (Default)
aelfgyfu_mead

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags