I've been reading about the edges of what seems to be a big dispute about warnings on fanfic. I don't want to argue here about anyone else's warnings; instead, I'm wondering whether mine are sufficient. I don't write a lot of the hot-button issues for people: I don't kill major characters, I don't want rape or any kind of non-con in my stories (heck, I hardly have even implications of sex in my stories!). I do get into some medical details, and a couple of my stories deal with PTSD, which I realized only recently I never labeled as such.

Ought I to label PTSD as such, or give any other kind of warning? For anyone who wants to look, do you think my warnings are sufficient, too vague, too idiosyncratic, or helpful?

On a related note, [livejournal.com profile] sg_fignewton has asked people what kinds of summaries make them read stories, and I was also discussing this on another LJ (I've forgotten whose; if you've seen my comments there, please remind me!). I realized that I've been describing as summaries I don't like exactly the sort of summaries I give for my own stories. I mean, really:
• Is "'Menace' retold from a crucial point of view" actually a useful summary, or too vague to be any help? (If I've done my job right, you figure out whose point of view within a few sentences--am I wrong to hold onto that element of surprise?).
• "Sam and her brother talk after 'Threads'"--I don't want to spoil "Threads" for anyone who hasn't seen it and so might not know of what I consider a major character and arc development, but I doubt I would read this story, if it were written by an author I didn't know and I stumbled across it on a day when I already have several tabs' worth of fic open!

My stories can all be found at Aelfgyfu's Mead Hall. (That's actually the link to the right-hand side of the bar above my entries on my LJ page, but I've noticed that people keep missing it, perhaps because they read my entries on their friends' page or in their own style rather than on my page in my style. Or maybe they miss it because it's not differentiated from the "Previous Entries" "Next Entries" etc. standard info in the bar.)

Feel free to comment on my warnings, summaries, etc.; I don't feel that I get a lot of readers, and I'd appreciate anything that could help me attract more. I'm also curious about what my friends do, and happy to talk about your descriptions, either in comments or on your LJ, if you make a similar post. (Dang, I suppose this entry is too long to start a meme! We could do:
1. Are my warnings too detailed, too vague, or just right?
2. Which of my summaries do you like best? Least?)
Tags:

From: [identity profile] a-phoenixdragon.livejournal.com


I think youre summaries are fine, hon - but then they are such tricky things! I warn HARDCORE for all my fics, but then most of my fics ARE hardcore, lol!

*hugs you*

From: [identity profile] lukadreaming.livejournal.com


I tend to shove 18 on as a default warning unless it's very obviously gen or something pretty light. I would specifically warn for death and rape in the unlikely event of me writing either. I might also adopt, if appropriate, [livejournal.com profile] fredbassett's rather nicely worded 'Warning: Advert/extreme kink, depending on your views' line *g*.

From: [identity profile] lukadreaming.livejournal.com


I do write smut (ahem!) but part of the reason I put 18 on as a default is because of the swearing. I labelled one 16 on the ARC archive a while back and got my knuckles smartly rapped by the mod for not making in 18 because there was cussing in it *g*.

Sometimes now I do put 18 (swearing) as the warning, as I know you and several others might be OK reading that but don't want the sex *g*.

From: [identity profile] lukadreaming.livejournal.com


I was surprised at the issue over language, but just shrugged and stuck 18 on as a default. I'm writing mainly about SF soldiers who are bound to swear!

Puppet sex? OK, riiiiight . . . *Steps away cautiously and hopes no one will get hurt* *bg*.
ext_2180: laurel leaf (a smile for you // sg1)

From: [identity profile] loriel-eris.livejournal.com


Both [livejournal.com profile] yahtzee63 here and [livejournal.com profile] seperis here said some stuff which I pretty much 95% agree with. (The 5% which I do not agree with, is the bit in which old shows do not require spoilers. *g*) But all joking aside, I'm pretty much with hese two posts. Especially relevant bit for this post, is what [livejournal.com profile] seperis said. ;)

Having just looked at all you story summaries headers, I'd say that your summaries are fine. However, the distinction I made, is essential. Standing alone, some of your summaries aren't enough. However, the word count, spoilers and categories (gen, drama, h/c, etc) as well as the summaries, are fine. If that makes sense.

Edited for HTML and English fail...

God. Edited again for more English fail.
ext_2180: laurel leaf (beautiful mind // x files)

From: [identity profile] loriel-eris.livejournal.com


PS. (Because I refuse to edit that comment again.)

I hate really don't appreciate character death warnings. Not all the time; if your story starts with the character already dead/you it in the first sentence, then feel free to warn for character death (mostly because I don't care). However, if the death is part of the story/plot development, then hell mend you (the author) for telling me that at the beginning of the story. Death is kinda, y'know, to be expected when you have people that are, y'know, living. And if you (the reader) don't know that by this point, then god, you have much bigger issues than character death warnings on a story. *deep breath*

I have read stories with a CD warning. And I have even read stories in which the warned for CD happens as part of the story. For the most part, I've enjoyed these stories well enough, but they do lose something, for me, by my knowing that one of the main characters (in the story) will die. I have actually read one, maybe two, stories in which I was warned at the start for CD and I got to the end and was utterly surprised, and devastated, to discover that Rodney (/John/whoever) had died!? But that was one (or two) very, very, very well written stories out of countless others.

I actually don't get as pissed off with CD warnings on stories as it appears above. Tho, that's mostly because of years of people doing and I am resigned. But I have always disliked CD warnings on fic.
ext_2180: laurel leaf (laurel leaf)

From: [identity profile] loriel-eris.livejournal.com


When I was typing this out last night, I just knew that you were (going to be) in that side of the fence re character death warnings. That, however, didn't cause me to re-think what I said, when perhaps I should have. I do apologise for sounding so militant, especially when I suspected that you would be on the other side of my 'rant', and when I've grown rather resigned to character death warnings and it's very rare that I actually feel this wound about it. So I apologise that you got the one character death warning rant in about 6 years.

[I'm away for the day, and don't have time to respond to the rest of you comment, I just wanted to apologise now.]

From: [identity profile] reggietate.livejournal.com


Personally, I don't mid character death in fic, because while it might make me unhappy, I know the same characters are just as likely to be alive and well in the next fic - unlike in real life, or even in the original show when they're gone for good. But then, I'm an angst fan :-)

From: [identity profile] sg-betty.livejournal.com


I tend to immerse myself in the characters when I read or watch films. I know intellectually that it's just a story, but it doesn't feel like that (Um. It's even worse when it's animals...). I find it very disturbing, and sometimes it stays with me for a long while. Sometimes, I even throw the book away, if it seems unnecessary, gratuitous, or manipulative.

From: [identity profile] sg-betty.livejournal.com


Well, I'm going to have to go look! ;) I don't really read summaries. If it's gen and PG, I'll read it. It's not like there's tons of those...

The whole converation about warnings and summaries got me thinking, as well. I never do summaries. Are people skipping my stories because of it? Since I don't write anything that I consider anything other than PG-13, I don't really think about warnings, just spoiler notices, but there was one story about Daniel and Vala after 'Origin' that really shouls have had a warning, in retrospect. Some discussion of, um, burning... Guess I better go add a warning to that.

From: [identity profile] sg-betty.livejournal.com


What if there's nothing to warn about? Or do you mean ratings. I always put those...

On the summaries, why do the summaries matter so much if there's a rating, especially when it's gen? Just curious--but I admit that I hate writing the darn things and am probably looking for a way out.
.

Profile

aelfgyfu_mead: Aelfgyfu as a South Park-style cartoon (Default)
aelfgyfu_mead

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags